CBSEGrade 11MathematicsStatistics

Interpreting Correlation?

A study reveals a positive correlation coefficient of 0.8 between the number of hours studied and the marks obtained by students in a mathematics test. However, upon closer inspection, it's found that students who studied more hours were also more likely to have access to better resources and guidance. Can the correlation coefficient alone justify the conclusion that studying more hours directly leads to higher marks?

💬 1 answers0 votes👁 42 views17 July 2026

1 Answer

🤖
AI-Assisted Answer
0

📌 CONCEPT: Correlation coefficient alone cannot justify the direct cause-and-effect relationship between two variables. It only indicates the strength and direction of the linear relationship.

📐 RULE / FORMULA: To establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship, it's essential to consider other factors that might influence the outcome, often referred to as 'confounding variables'.

💡 WORKED EXAMPLE: Suppose we want to study the relationship between the number of hours spent watching TV and the number of hours spent exercising. A positive correlation coefficient suggests that watching more TV is related to exercising less. However, it might be due to the fact that people who watch more TV are also more likely to be sedentary, hence exercising less. To establish a direct relationship, we need to control for the confounding variable 'sedentary lifestyle'.

⚠️ COMMON MISTAKE: Assuming a correlation coefficient implies causation, which is often not the case due to the presence of confounding variables.

17 Jul 26